EN

Tracker / CVE-2024-27005

CVE-2024-27005

Alta 7.8

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: interconnect: Don't access req_list while it's being manipulated The icc_lock mutex was split into separate icc_lock and icc_bw_lock mutexes in [1] to avoid lockdep splats. However, this didn't adequately protect access to icc_node::req_list. The icc_set_bw() function will eventually iterate over req_list while only holding icc_bw_lock, but req_list can be modified while only holding icc_lock. This causes races between icc_set_bw(), of_icc_get(), and icc_put(). Example A: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- icc_set_bw(path_a) mutex_lock(&icc_bw_lock); icc_put(path_b) mutex_lock(&icc_lock); aggregate_requests() hlist_for_each_entry(r, ... hlist_del(... <r = invalid pointer> Example B: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- icc_set_bw(path_a) mutex_lock(&icc_bw_lock); path_b = of_icc_get() of_icc_get_by_index() mutex_lock(&icc_lock); path_find() path_init() aggregate_requests() hlist_for_each_entry(r, ... hlist_add_head(... <r = invalid pointer> Fix this by ensuring icc_bw_lock is always held before manipulating icc_node::req_list. The additional places icc_bw_lock is held don't perform any memory allocations, so we should still be safe from the original lockdep splats that motivated the separate locks. [1] commit af42269c3523 ("interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim")

Prodotti e versioni affette

linux linux_kernel
linux linux_kernel · 5.15.133 → 5.16
linux linux_kernel · 6.1.55 → 6.2
linux linux_kernel · 6.5.5 → 6.6.29
linux linux_kernel · 6.7 → 6.8.8

Analisi

Questa pagina non è ancora indicizzabile.Finché non contiene un’analisi originale — cosa espone davvero, come verificare in due minuti se un sistema è stato toccato, cosa fare se lo è stato — la pagina resta noindex. È il database a deciderlo, non il modello di pagina.

Riferimenti