58.450 CVE tracked
792 Exploited now
188 Used by ransomware
Last sync
CVE Tracker
58.450 CVE
Ten vendors followed by CPE identifier, not by keyword: a CVE appears here once NVD says which products it affects — usually a few days after it is published.
| Identifier | Severity, sort descending | Product and flaw | EPSS, sort descending | In KEV since, sorted descending |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-38408 | HIGH 7.8 | adobe illustrator Adobe Illustrator versions 26.4 (and earlier) and 25.4.7 (and earlier) are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interac | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2022-38407 | MED 5.5 | adobe incopy Adobe InCopy version 17.3 (and earlier) and 16.4.2 (and earlier) are affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass mitigations such as ASLR. Exploitati | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2022-38406 | MED 5.5 | adobe incopy Adobe InCopy version 17.3 (and earlier) and 16.4.2 (and earlier) are affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass mitigations such as ASLR. Exploitati | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2022-38405 | HIGH 7.8 | adobe incopy Adobe InCopy version 17.3 (and earlier) and 16.4.2 (and earlier) are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction i | 0.6% | — |
| CVE-2022-38404 | HIGH 7.8 | adobe incopy Adobe InCopy version 17.3 (and earlier) and 16.4.2 (and earlier) are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction i | 0.6% | — |
| CVE-2022-38403 | HIGH 7.8 | adobe incopy Adobe InCopy version 17.3 (and earlier) and 16.4.2 (and earlier) are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction i | 0.6% | — |
| CVE-2022-38402 | HIGH 7.8 | adobe incopy Adobe InCopy version 17.3 (and earlier) and 16.4.2 (and earlier) are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction i | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2022-38401 | HIGH 7.8 | adobe incopy Adobe InCopy version 17.3 (and earlier) and 16.4.2 (and earlier) are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction i | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2022-38398 | MED 5.3 | apache batik Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to load a url thru the jar protocol. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. | 2.6% | — |
| CVE-2022-38396 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10_1507 HP Factory Preinstalled Images on certain systems that shipped with Windows 10 versions 20H2 and earlier OS versions might allow escalation of privilege via execution of certain files outside the restricted path. This potential vulnerability was remediated sta | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2022-38391 | MED 5.1 | ibm spectrum_control IBM Spectrum Control 5.4 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 233982. | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2022-38387 | HIGH 7.1 | ibm cloud_pak_for_security IBM Cloud Pak for Security (CP4S) 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.2.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system by sending a specially crafted request. IBM X-Force ID: 233786. | 0.9% | — |
| CVE-2022-38385 | HIGH 7.1 | ibm cloud_pak_for_security IBM Cloud Pak for Security (CP4S) 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.2.0 could allow an authenticated user to obtain highly sensitive information or perform unauthorized actions due to improper input validation. IBM X-Force ID: 233777. | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2022-38381 | MED 5.3 | fortinet fortiadc An improper handling of malformed request vulnerability [CWE-228] exists in FortiADC 5.0 all versions, 6.0.0 all versions, 6.1.0 all versions, 6.2.0 through 6.2.3, and 7.0.0 through 7.0.2. This may allow a remote attacker without privileges to bypass some Web | 0.7% | — |
| CVE-2022-38380 | MED 4.3 | fortinet fortios An improper access control [CWE-284] vulnerability in FortiOS version 7.2.0 and versions 7.0.0 through 7.0.7 may allow a remote authenticated read-only user to modify the interface settings via the API. | 23.0% | — |
| CVE-2022-38379 | LOW 3.5 | fortinet fortisoar Improper neutralization of input during web page generation [CWE-79] in FortiSOAR 7.0.0 through 7.0.3 and 7.2.0 may allow an authenticated attacker to inject HTML tags via input fields of various components within FortiSOAR. | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2022-38378 | MED 4.2 | fortinet fortios An improper privilege management vulnerability [CWE-269] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 and before 7.0.7 and FortiProxy version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 and before 7.0.7 allows an attacker that has access to the admin profile section (System subsection Administr | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2022-38377 | MED 4.3 | fortinet fortianalyzer An improper access control vulnerability [CWE-284] in FortiManager 7.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, 6.4.0 through 6.4.7, 6.2.0 through 6.2.9, 6.0.0 through 6.0.11 and FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, 6.4.0 through 6.4.8, 6.2.0 through 6.2.10, 6.0.0 through | 0.6% | — |
| CVE-2022-38376 | MED 6.1 | fortinet fortinac Multiple improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerabilities [CWE-79] in Fortinet FortiNAC portal UI before 9.4.1 allows an attacker to perform an XSS attack via crafted HTTP requests. | 0.6% | — |
| CVE-2022-38375 | CRIT 9.1 | fortinet fortinac An improper authorization vulnerability [CWE-285] in Fortinet FortiNAC version 9.4.0 through 9.4.1 and before 9.2.6 allows an unauthenticated user to perform some administrative operations over the FortiNAC instance via crafted HTTP POST requests. | 1.1% | — |
| CVE-2022-38374 | HIGH 8.8 | fortinet fortiadc A improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Fortinet FortiADC 7.0.0 - 7.0.2 and 6.2.0 - 6.2.4 allows an attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via the URL and User fields observed in the traffic and even | 1.9% | — |
| CVE-2022-38373 | HIGH 8.0 | fortinet fortideceptor An improper neutralization of input during web page generation vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiDeceptor management interface 4.2.0, 4.1.0 through 4.1.1, 4.0.2 may allow an authenticated user to perform a cross site scripting (XSS) attack via sending requests wi | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2022-38372 | MED 6.7 | fortinet fortitester A hidden functionality vulnerability [CWE-1242] in FortiTester CLI 2.3.0 through 3.9.1, 4.0.0 through 4.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.1.0 may allow a local, privileged user to obtain a root shell on the device via an undocumented command. | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2022-38370 | HIGH 7.5 | apache iotdb Apache IoTDB grafana-connector version 0.13.0 contains an interface without authorization, which may expose the internal structure of database. Users should upgrade to version 0.13.1 which addresses this issue. | 1.3% | — |
| CVE-2022-38369 | HIGH 8.8 | apache iotdb Apache IoTDB version 0.13.0 is vulnerable by session id attack. Users should upgrade to version 0.13.1 which addresses this issue. | 1.3% | — |