58.507 CVE tracked
793 Exploited now
188 Used by ransomware
Last sync
CVE Tracker
58.507 CVE
Ten vendors followed by CPE identifier, not by keyword: a CVE appears here once NVD says which products it affects — usually a few days after it is published.
| Identifier | Severity, sort descending | Product and flaw | EPSS, sort descending | In KEV since, sorted descending |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-33980 | CRIT 9.8 | apache commons_configuration Apache Commons Configuration performs variable interpolation, allowing properties to be dynamically evaluated and expanded. The standard format for interpolation is "${prefix:name}", where "prefix" is used to locate an instance of org.apache.commons.configurat | 44.6% | — |
| CVE-2022-33973 | LOW 3.3 | intel wlan_authentication_and_privacy_infrastructure Improper access control in the Intel(R) WAPI Security software for Windows 10/11 before version 22.2150.0.1 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2022-33968 | LOW 3.7 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager In BIG-IP Versions 17.0.x before 17.0.0.1, 16.1.x before 16.1.3.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.6.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.5.1, and all versions of 13.1.x, when an LTM monitor or APM SSO is configured on a virtual server, and NTLM challenge-response is in use, undisclosed | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2022-33962 | MED 6.7 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager In BIG-IP Versions 17.0.x before 17.0.0.1, 16.1.x before 16.1.3.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.6.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.5.1, and all versions of 13.1.x, certain iRules commands may allow an attacker to bypass the access control restrictions for a self IP address, regard | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2022-33954 | MED 4.6 | ibm robotic_process_automation IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.1, 21.0.2, and 21.0.3 could allow a user with psychical access to the system to obtain sensitive information due to insufficiently protected credentials. | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2022-33947 | MED 5.4 | f5 big-ip_domain_name_system In BIG-IP Versions 16.1.x before 16.1.3, 15.1.x before 15.1.6.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.5, and all versions of 13.1.x, a vulnerability exists in undisclosed pages of the BIG-IP DNS Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI) that allows an authenticated attacker with | 0.7% | — |
| CVE-2022-33879 | LOW 3.3 | apache tika The initial fixes in CVE-2022-30126 and CVE-2022-30973 for regexes in the StandardsExtractingContentHandler were insufficient, and we found a separate, new regex DoS in a different regex in the StandardsExtractingContentHandler. These are now fixed in 1.28.4 a | 2.0% | — |
| CVE-2022-33878 | LOW 2.2 | fortinet forticlient An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor vulnerabiltiy [CWE-200] in FortiClient for Mac versions 7.0.0 through 7.0.5 may allow a local authenticated attacker to obtain the SSL-VPN password in cleartext via running a logstream for the Forti | 0.1% | — |
| CVE-2022-33877 | HIGH 7.0 | fortinet forticlient An incorrect default permission [CWE-276] vulnerability in FortiClient (Windows) versions 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and 6.4.0 through 6.4.8 and FortiConverter (Windows) versions 6.2.0 through 6.2.1, 7.0.0 and all versions of 6.0.0 may allow a local authenticated att | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2022-33876 | MED 5.4 | fortinet fortiadc Multiple instances of improper input validation vulnerability in Fortinet FortiADC version 7.1.0, version 7.0.0 through 7.0.2 and version 6.2.4 and below allows an authenticated attacker to retrieve files with specific extension from the underlying Linux syste | 0.8% | — |
| CVE-2022-33875 | MED 5.4 | fortinet fortiadc An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiADC version 7.1.0, version 7.0.0 through 7.0.2 and version 6.2.4 and below allows an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or c | 0.8% | — |
| CVE-2022-33874 | CRIT 9.8 | fortinet fortitester An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerabilities [CWE-78] in SSH login components of FortiTester 2.3.0 through 3.9.1, 4.0.0 through 4.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.1.0 may allow an unauthenticated remote atta | 3.0% | — |
| CVE-2022-33873 | MED 6.8 | fortinet fortitester An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerabilities [CWE-78] in Console login components of FortiTester 2.3.0 through 3.9.1, 4.0.0 through 4.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.1.0 may allow an unauthenticated attacke | 2.6% | — |
| CVE-2022-33872 | CRIT 9.8 | fortinet fortitester An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerabilities [CWE-78] in Telnet login components of FortiTester 2.3.0 through 3.9.1, 4.0.0 through 4.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.1.0 may allow an unauthenticated remote a | 3.0% | — |
| CVE-2022-33871 | MED 6.6 | fortinet fortiweb A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] in FortiWeb version 7.0.1 and earlier, 6.4 all versions, version 6.3.19 and earlier may allow a privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specifically crafted CLI `execute backup-local r | 0.9% | — |
| CVE-2022-33870 | HIGH 7.8 | fortinet fortitester An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command vulnerability [CWE-78] in the command line interpreter of FortiTester 3.0.0 through 3.9.1, 4.0.0 through 4.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.1.0 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2022-33869 | HIGH 8.8 | fortinet fortiwan An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command vulnerability [CWE-78] in the management interface of FortiWAN 4.0.0 through 4.5.9 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted arguments to e | 1.3% | — |
| CVE-2022-33744 | MED 4.7 | debian debian_linux Arm guests can cause Dom0 DoS via PV devices When mapping pages of guests on Arm, dom0 is using an rbtree to keep track of the foreign mappings. Updating of that rbtree is not always done completely with the related lock held, resulting in a small race window, | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2022-33743 | HIGH 7.8 | debian debian_linux network backend may cause Linux netfront to use freed SKBs While adding logic to support XDP (eXpress Data Path), a code label was moved in a way allowing for SKBs having references (pointers) retained for further processing to nevertheless be freed. | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2022-33742 | HIGH 7.1 | debian debian_linux Linux disk/nic frontends data leaks T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Linux Block and Network PV device frontends don't zero memory regions before sharing them with | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2022-33741 | HIGH 7.1 | debian debian_linux Linux disk/nic frontends data leaks T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Linux Block and Network PV device frontends don't zero memory regions before sharing them with | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2022-33740 | HIGH 7.1 | debian debian_linux Linux disk/nic frontends data leaks T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Linux Block and Network PV device frontends don't zero memory regions before sharing them with | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2022-33684 | HIGH 8.1 | apache pulsar The Apache Pulsar C++ Client does not verify peer TLS certificates when making HTTPS calls for the OAuth2.0 Client Credential Flow, even when tlsAllowInsecureConnection is disabled via configuration. This vulnerability allows an attacker to perform a man in th | 0.7% | — |
| CVE-2022-33683 | MED 5.9 | apache pulsar Apache Pulsar Brokers and Proxies create an internal Pulsar Admin Client that does not verify peer TLS certificates, even when tlsAllowInsecureConnection is disabled via configuration. The Pulsar Admin Client's intra-cluster and geo-replication HTTPS connectio | 0.7% | — |
| CVE-2022-33682 | MED 5.9 | apache pulsar TLS hostname verification cannot be enabled in the Pulsar Broker's Java Client, the Pulsar Broker's Java Admin Client, the Pulsar WebSocket Proxy's Java Client, and the Pulsar Proxy's Admin Client leaving intra-cluster connections and geo-replication connectio | 0.7% | — |