58.575 CVE tracked
797 Exploited now
188 Used by ransomware
Last sync
CVE Tracker
58.575 CVE
Ten vendors followed by CPE identifier, not by keyword: a CVE appears here once NVD says which products it affects — usually a few days after it is published.
| Identifier | Severity, sort descending | Product and flaw | EPSS, sorted descending | In KEV since, sort descending |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-1246 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1237, CVE-2020-1262, CVE-2020-1264, | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2020-0788 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0877, CVE-2020-0887. | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2020-0784 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when DirectX improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectX Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0888. | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2020-0732 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when DirectX improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectX Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0709. | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2020-0726 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0691, CVE-2020-0719, CVE-2020-0720, CVE-2020- | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2020-0723 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0691, CVE-2020-0719, CVE-2020-0720, CVE-2020- | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2020-0722 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0691, CVE-2020-0719, CVE-2020-0720, CVE-2020- | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2020-0721 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0691, CVE-2020-0719, CVE-2020-0720, CVE-2020- | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2020-0720 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0691, CVE-2020-0719, CVE-2020-0721, CVE-2020- | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2020-0715 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Graphics Component improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0745, CVE-2020-0792. | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2020-0709 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when DirectX improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'DirectX Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0732. | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2020-0691 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Windows kernel-mode driver fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0719, CVE-2020-0720, CVE-2020-0721, | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2019-4741 | MED 5.3 | ibm content_navigator IBM Content Navigator 3.0CD is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This may allow an unauthenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2017-15649 | HIGH 7.8 | linux linux_kernel net/packet/af_packet.c in the Linux kernel before 4.13.6 allows local users to gain privileges via crafted system calls that trigger mishandling of packet_fanout data structures, because of a race condition (involving fanout_add and packet_do_bind) that leads | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2024-49026 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft 365_apps Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2024-43520 | MED 5.0 | microsoft windows_10_1507 Windows Kernel Denial of Service Vulnerability | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2023-20124 | MED 6.5 | cisco rv016_firmware A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV016, RV042, RV042G, RV082, RV320, and RV325 Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2022-22190 | HIGH 7.4 | juniper paragon_active_assurance_control_center An Improper Access Control vulnerability in the Juniper Networks Paragon Active Assurance Control Center allows an unauthenticated attacker to leverage a crafted URL to generate PDF reports, potentially containing sensitive configuration information. A feature | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2022-20678 | HIGH 8.6 | cisco ios_xe A vulnerability in the AppNav-XE feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to the incorrect handling of ce | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2021-23051 | HIGH 7.5 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP versions 15.1.0.4 through 15.1.3, when the Data Plane Development Kit (DPDK)/Elastic Network Adapter (ENA) driver is used with BIG-IP on Amazon Web Services (AWS) systems, undisclosed requests can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to ter | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2021-23049 | HIGH 7.5 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2 and 15.1.x before 15.1.3, when the iRules RESOLVER::summarize command is used on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause an increase in Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) memory utilization resulting in an ou | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2021-23048 | HIGH 7.5 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.3.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.3, 13.1.x before 13.1.4.1, and all versions of 12.1.x and 11.6.x, when GPRS Tunneling Protocol (GTP) iRules commands or a GTP profile is configured on a virtual server, undi | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2021-23030 | HIGH 7.5 | f5 big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewall On BIG-IP Advanced WAF and BIG-IP ASM version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.3.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.3, 13.1.x before 13.1.4.1, and all versions of 12.1.x, when a WebSocket profile is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2021-23011 | HIGH 7.5 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.3, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.4, 12.1.x before 12.1.6, and 11.6.x before 11.6.5.3, when the BIG-IP system is buffering packet fragments for reassembly, the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2021-23010 | HIGH 7.5 | f5 big-ip_application_security_manager On versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2, 14.1.x before 14.1.3.1, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.5, and 12.1.x before 12.1.5.3, when the BIG-IP ASM/Advanced WAF system processes WebSocket requests with JSON payloads using the default JSON Content Profile | 1.0% | — |