60.368 CVE tracked
809 Exploited now
188 Used by ransomware
Last sync
CVE Tracker
60.368 CVE
Ten vendors followed by CPE identifier, not by keyword: a CVE appears here once NVD says which products it affects — usually a few days after it is published.
| Identifier | Severity, sorted ascending | Product and flaw | EPSS, sort descending | In KEV since, sort descending |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-0134 | MED 5.3 | cisco mobility_services_engine A vulnerability in the RADIUS authentication module of Cisco Policy Suite could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to determine whether a subscriber username is valid. The vulnerability occurs because the Cisco Policy Suite RADIUS server component retur | 1.4% | — |
| CVE-2018-0111 | MED 5.3 | cisco webex_meetings_server A vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access sensitive data about the application. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain information to conduct additional reconnaissance attacks. The vu | 1.7% | — |
| CVE-2018-0108 | MED 5.3 | cisco webex_meetings_server A vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to collect customer files via an out-of-band XML External Entity (XXE) injection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain information to conduct additio | 1.8% | — |
| CVE-2018-0105 | MED 5.3 | cisco unified_communications_manager A vulnerability in the web framework of Cisco Unified Communications Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive data. The vulnerability is due to insufficient protection of database tables. An attacker could exploit this vulnerab | 1.7% | — |
| CVE-2018-0062 | MED 5.3 | juniper junos A Denial of Service vulnerability in J-Web service may allow a remote unauthenticated user to cause Denial of Service which may prevent other users to authenticate or to perform J-Web operations. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS: 12.1X46 version | 2.3% | — |
| CVE-2018-0061 | MED 5.3 | juniper junos A denial of service vulnerability in the telnetd service on Junos OS allows remote unauthenticated users to cause high CPU usage which may affect system performance. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS: 12.1X46 versions prior to 12.1X46-D81 on SRX | 2.3% | — |
| CVE-2018-0060 | MED 5.3 | juniper junos An improper input validation weakness in the device control daemon process (dcd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service to the dcd process and interfaces and connected clients when the Junos device is requesting an IP addr | 1.1% | — |
| CVE-2018-0034 | MED 5.3 | juniper junos A Denial of Service vulnerability exists in the Juniper Networks Junos OS JDHCPD daemon which allows an attacker to core the JDHCPD daemon by sending a crafted IPv6 packet to the system. This issue is limited to systems which receives IPv6 DHCP packets on a sy | 2.1% | — |
| CVE-2018-0031 | MED 5.3 | juniper junos Receipt of specially crafted UDP/IP packets over MPLS may be able to bypass a stateless firewall filter. The crafted UDP packets must be encapsulated and meet a very specific packet format to be classified in a way that bypasses IP firewall filter rules. The p | 1.2% | — |
| CVE-2018-0019 | MED 5.3 | juniper junos A vulnerability in Junos OS SNMP MIB-II subagent daemon (mib2d) may allow a remote network based attacker to cause the mib2d process to crash resulting in a denial of service condition (DoS) for the SNMP subsystem. While a mib2d process crash can disrupt the n | 1.5% | — |
| CVE-2017-9796 | MED 5.3 | apache geode When an Apache Geode cluster before v1.3.0 is operating in secure mode, a user with read access to specific regions within a Geode cluster may execute OQL queries containing a region name as a bind parameter that allow read access to objects within unauthorize | 1.5% | — |
| CVE-2017-9491 | MED 5.3 | cisco dpc3939_firmware The Comcast firmware on Cisco DPC3939 (firmware version dpc3939-P20-18-v303r20421733-160420a-CMCST); Cisco DPC3939 (firmware version dpc3939-P20-18-v303r20421746-170221a-CMCST); Cisco DPC3939B (firmware version dpc3939b-v303r204217-150321a-CMCST); Cisco DPC394 | 1.3% | — |
| CVE-2017-8746 | MED 5.3 | microsoft windows_10 Windows Device Guard in Windows 10 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows A security feature bypass vulnerability due to how PowerShell exposes functions and processes user supplied code, aka "Device Guard Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability". | 1.4% | — |
| CVE-2017-8716 | MED 5.3 | microsoft windows_10 Windows Control Flow Guard in Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1703 allows an attacker to run a specially crafted application to bypass Control Flow Guard, due to the way that Control Flow Guard handles objects in memory, aka "Windows Security Feature Bypass Vulne | 1.4% | — |
| CVE-2017-8715 | MED 5.3 | microsoft windows_10 The Microsoft Device Guard on Microsoft Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows a security feature bypass by the way it handles Windows PowerShell sessions, aka "Windows Security Feature Bypass". | 1.7% | — |
| CVE-2017-8713 | MED 5.3 | microsoft windows_10 The Windows Hyper-V component on Microsoft Windows Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an information disclosure vulnerability when it fails to properly validate input from an auth | 3.5% | — |
| CVE-2017-8712 | MED 5.3 | microsoft windows_10 The Windows Hyper-V component on Microsoft Windows 10 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an information disclosure vulnerability when it fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Information D | 2.1% | — |
| CVE-2017-8711 | MED 5.3 | microsoft windows_10 The Windows Hyper-V component on Microsoft Windows 10 1607 and Windows Server 2016 allows an information disclosure vulnerability when it fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Information Disclosu | 2.1% | — |
| CVE-2017-8707 | MED 5.3 | microsoft windows_10 The Windows Hyper-V component on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an information disclosure vulnerability when it fails to properly | 2.4% | — |
| CVE-2017-8706 | MED 5.3 | microsoft windows_10 The Windows Hyper-V component on Microsoft Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an information disclosure vulnerability when it fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper | 2.4% | — |
| CVE-2017-8704 | MED 5.3 | microsoft windows_10 The Windows Hyper-V component on Microsoft Windows 10 1607 and Windows Server 2016 allows a denial of service vulnerability when it fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerab | 1.5% | — |
| CVE-2017-8695 | MED 5.3 | microsoft live_meeting Windows Uniscribe in Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Server 2016; Office 2007 SP3; Office 2010 SP2; Word Viewer; Office for Mac 20 | 9.6% | — |
| CVE-2017-8637 | MED 5.3 | microsoft edge Microsoft Edge in Microsoft Windows 10 1703 allows an attacker to bypass Arbitrary Code Guard (ACG) due to how Microsoft Edge accesses memory in code compiled by the Edge Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler, aka "Scripting Engine Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability" | 5.0% | — |
| CVE-2017-7782 | MED 5.3 | mozilla firefox An error in the "WindowsDllDetourPatcher" where a RWX ("Read/Write/Execute") 4k block is allocated but never protected, violating DEP protections. Note: This attack only affects Windows operating systems. Other operating systems are not affected. This vulnerab | 1.1% | — |
| CVE-2017-7685 | MED 5.3 | apache openmeetings Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 responds to the following insecure HTTP methods: PUT, DELETE, HEAD, and PATCH. | 2.9% | — |